Reasin Davis
plaintiff complains of
the Defendants,
George W. Davis
and
Georgia Davis
and for cause of complaint
says that heretofore towit - On the 18th day of March 1869 at the
County and State aforesaid the plaintiff and the Defendant Georgia Davis were
married and that they lived together as husband and wife until about the year
when by the bad conduct of the Defendant the plaintiff and defendant were
separated, and the plaintiff on the 6th day of March 1872, filed his
complaint for divorce from said Defendant in the Shelby Circuit Court. And Plaintiff avers, that owing the time
that Plaintiff and Defendant Georgia lived together as husband and wife, there
was born to them as the fruit of said marriage one child
towit
-
Fannie M. Davis
who is yet living and of the age of Four and one half years old. That in said complaint for divorce this
plaintiff prayed the Court for the care custody and guardianship of said child
and the Defendant also by her cross complaint asked the same. And Plaintiff avers that on the 15th
day of the Shelby Circuit Court A.D. 1872 said cause for divorce between
plaintiff and Defendant came on for trial, and was disposed of by said Court by
granting to this plaintiff a divorce, and the care and custody of said child
was given to the Defendant, George W. Davis, and plaintiff marked a copy of the
decree of the Court in granting said divorce and the order of the same as to
said child a part of this his complaint and marks the same exhibit “A”. And plaintiff avers that since said order of
said Court as to said child the plaintiff has married to another woman and is
now the head of a family, and is the owner of considerable property towit; more than Eighty thousand Dollars and that
he is in every way calculated and prepared to take charge of said child that he
is the father of said child and greatly attached to the same. That the Defendant Georgia is unmarried, and
is not a suitable person in any respect to take charge of said child that she
is not the owner of any property whatever, except about $150 and is dependent
upon the charities of others for her support.
And that her character, for chastity and virtue is bad.
That said
child is yet in more the control of the Defendant George W. Davis, who
refuses to allow this plaintiff the control thereof. Wherefore plaintiff sues and demands the custody control and
guardianship of his said child Fannie, and that so much of said order of said
court as awards the custody of said child to the Defendant George W. Davis be
set aside vacated and held for naught, and of which the equity of the case
demands. Hord &
Blair Attys for “Plff.”